Comparing the processing of word category and agreement information during auditory sentence comprehension: Evidence from ERPs

Kerstin Mauth1, Anja Hahne2, Angela D. Friederici2
kerstin.mauth@mpi.nl, hahne@cns.mpg.de, angelafr@cns.mpg.de
1 Max-Planck-Institute for Psycholinguistics, Wundtlaan 1, 6525 XD Nijmegen (NL)
2 Max-Planck-Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Stephanstr. 1a, 04103 Leipzig

In the current study event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded to auditorily presented sentences in order to examine the time course and topographic distribution of word-category information and morpho-syntactic information during sentence processing. Recent research reported that the violation of word-category information elicited a particularly early anterior negativity often lateralized to the left hemisphere (ELAN, 150-200 ms) while the violation of morpho-syntactic information elicited a negativity with a similar distribution that occurred somewhat later relative to the former violation (LAN, 300-500 ms). This was taken to reflect two successive syntactic processing stages: a first stage during which word-category information is processed and a second - later - stage during which morpho-syntactic (and semantic) information is processed. However, there has never been a direct comparison of the two processes. The present study, therefore, presented German native speakers with sentences that carried either a word-category violation or a subject-verb-agreement violation. The auditory materials were designed such that the different types of violating information were provided at the same point in time relative to the onsets of the critical words, namely not before the final suffix of those words (e.g., (A) correct: `Die Sauce, die der Koch verfeinert, schmeckt sehr lecker.', (B) agreement violation: `Die Sauce, die der Koch[3rd Ps. Sg]. verfeinerst[2nd Ps. Sg]. , schmeckt sehr lecker', (C) word-category violation: `Die Sauce, die der Koch als NP[verfeinertV], schmeckt sehr lecker'). The data suggest that both types of violations elicit negativities that started equally early in time (at about 270 ms after the critical words' onsets). However, the distribution of those negative components differed between the conditions: while word-category violations (i.e., condition C) elicited a negativity that was most pronounced at the outer left anterior electrodes, the agreement violations (i.e., condition B) elicited an anterior negativity that was more centrally distributed. With respect to timing, it therefore appears that syntactic information is processed as soon as it is accessible irrespective of the type of information. By contrast, with respect to the topographic distribution of the respective ERP-components, it appears that the two information types can clearly be separated, suggesting different neural generators for the processing of word category and morpho-syntactic agreement information.


AMLaP Conference, Saarbrücken, September 2001