Two types of plural expressions and the mental representation of their referents

Stephanie Kelter1, Barbara Kaup2, and Berry Claus1
kelter@gp.tu-berlin.de, kaup@darwin.psy.fsu.edu, bclaus@cs.tu-berlin.de
1 Technical University of Berlin
2 Florida State University, Tallahassee

This study is concerned with the mental representation of the entities denoted by plural expressions (e.g., "the houses", "most orphans", "they"). One possible assumption is that the denotation of a plural expression is represented by a number of distinct tokens standing for the atomic individuals of the set referred to ("atomic-tokens view"). However, it is conceivable that plurality is mentally construed at a level of granularity that is coarser than the one for individual things. An utterance with a plural expression may be used for and understood as conveying information about an assemblage of individuals conceived of as a single whole. Accordingly, it could be assumed that the denotation of a plural expression is represented by a single token ("assemblage-token view"). Linguistic data suggest that neither of the two views is valid in general. Rather, the two views seem to hold for different types of plural expressions. More specifically, the atomic-tokens view seems to be appropriate for "partitioning" plural expressions, i.e., partitive plural NPs (e.g., "most of the orphans", "both of the cars") and functionally similar expressions (e.g., "most orphans" "both"). The assemblage-token view, in contrast, seems to hold for unmarked plural expressions (e.g., "the cars", "they"). This hypothesis was investigated in two experiments with German participants, contrasting sentences that contained either the partitioning pronoun "beide" ("both") or the non-partitioning pronoun "sie" ("they") as external argument. Experiment 1 investigated how the predicate of such sentences are interpreted. We hypothesized that with a sentence containing a partitioning expression as external argument (e.g., "both brought a gift"), the predicate would be interpreted as applying to each atomic individual (i.e., two gifts are brought), whereas with a sentence containing a non-partitioning expression as external argument (e.g., "they brought a gift"), the predicate would be interpreted as applying to the whole assemblage (i.e., one gift was brought). The aim of Experiment 2 was to obtain information as to whether anaphoric reference resolution of "they", but not of "both" involves grouping the individuals referred to. To this end, reading times of sentences with either "they" or "both" as external argument were measured, and ease of grouping was varied by manipulating the degree of commonality among the individuals referred to. The results of the experiments support the hypothesis that the denotation of a partitioning plural expression is represented by a number of distinct tokens whereas the denotation of a non-partitioning plural expression is represented by an assemblage token.


AMLaP Conference, Saarbrücken, September 2001