Ansgar Hantsch1, Jörg D. Jescheniak1, and Herbert Schriefers2
hantsch@cns.mpg.de, jeschen@cns.mpg.de, schriefers@nici.kun.nl
1 Max-Planck-Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience
2 Nijmegen Institute of Cognition and Information
Naming objects with gender marked noun phrases (NPs, "der Baum"
[the(masc) tree]) is inhibited more strongly by distractor words with
different gender (Vase [vase(fem)]) as compared to distractors with the
same gender (Käse [cheese(masc)]; Schriefers, 1993). Originally this
so-called gender-congruency effect was interpreted as the result of
competition during the selection of an abstract gender representation
(i.e., the feature "masculine"). Recently, Schiller and Caramazza
(submitted) replicated this effect for singular NPs but observed no such
effect for plural NPs ("die Bäume" [the(plural) trees]). Based on this
observation, they argued that the effect results from competition during
the selection of the determiner. On this account, no competition is to
be expected for plural NPs, because the plural determiner is identical
for the different gender classes. In three experiments we tested
predictions derived from this determiner competition account.
- In Experiment 1 participants named objects with singular or plural NPs
("der Baum" - "die Bäume" [the(masc) tree - the(plural) trees]). The
relative frequency of occurrence of the different determiners ("der",
"die", "das") was controlled. NP production was slower for plural NPs
compared to singular NPs, but only if determiners differed for singular
and plural (i.e., for masculine and neuter gender). No difference was
found if the determiner for singular and plural was identical (i.e., for
feminine gender).
- In Experiment 2 the same materials were used but participants produced
bare nouns ("Baum" [tree]) instead of NPs. If differences in the
relative ease of producing plural NPs vs. singular NPs across gender
classes rather than determiner competition were responsible for the
pattern of results in Experiment 1, a comparable pattern should be
obtained in Experiment 2. This was not the case.
- Experiment 3 finally replicated the pattern from Experiment 1, but this
time the relative frequency of occurrence of singular and plural trials
(rather than the relative frequency of occurrence of the different
determiners) was controlled.
Together. these results support the hypothesis that singular determiners
are activated by default during NP production.
References
Schiller, N.,& Caramazza, A. (submitted). Gender or determiner selection
interference? Evidence from noun phrase production in German and Dutch.
Schriefers, H. (1993). Syntactic processes in the production of noun
phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 19, 841-850.
AMLaP Conference, Saarbrücken, September 2001